In recent years, Malaysia
has been inching towards a greener mindset. There is now a much greater sense
of environmental awareness than ever before in the country, though I must admit
that it is still at a very humble level if compared to countries like Denmark, Germany,
or Japan.
In any case, there has been progress over the years and recently the hype is
about green buildings. Inspired by green building rating tools such as UK’s
BREEAM, USA’s LEED, Japan’s CASBEE, Australia’s GREENSTAR, and Singapore’s
GREEN MARK, to name a few, Malaysia introduced its very own Green Building
Index (GBI) in early 2009. GBI was jointly developed by the Malaysian Institute
of Architects (PAM) and the Association of Consulting Engineers Malaysia
(ACEM).
One may question the necessity for so many different standards, but
according to the official GBI website:
Green rating tools by its nature and role is very dependent upon location
and environment and thus climate… Malaysia’s Green Building Index or
GBI will be the only rating tool for the tropical zones other than Singapore
Government’s GREEN MARK.
So in other words, Malaysia’s
GBI is customized to suit local conditions – our climate, current state of
development, and existing resources. The GBI rating is based on six key
criteria (generally based on the LEED certification of USA):
- Energy Efficiency
- Indoor Environmental Quality
- Sustainable Site Planning and Management
- Materials and Resources
- Water Efficiency
- Innovation
- Construction using 53% recycled materials;
- Photovoltaic panels which will double as a sun shade device;
- 100% daylighting of all office areas;
- Collection and reuse of rainwater for irrigation and toilet flushing;
- Extremely low energy mechanical systems using radiant heating and cooling within the building’s concrete structural slabs;
- Solar shading devices on all south-facing windows;
- High efficiency lighting with automatic controls to limit use when adequate daylight is available;
- Concrete with slag to significantly reduce CO2 and cement content, and to increase strength;
- Vertically post-tensioned structure to minimize potential damage due to earthquakes;
- Operable windows and low pressure ventilation via the raised floor system to maximize indoor air quality;
- CO2 sensors that call for extra fresh air if required; and
- Exterior and interior materials that ensure healthy air quality, maximize recycled content, avoid off-gassing, and minimize environmental impacts from production and transportation.
The David Brower Center
is expected to attain the LEED Platinum rating, the highest possible rating
from the LEED program. As one can see from the above list of characteristics,
many factors are taken into consideration right from the early design and
planning stages of building a green building. Like the materials used for
construction, the placing of photovoltaic panels for optimal exposure to
sunlight, the positioning of windows and openings for day-lighting and natural
ventilation, and the rainwater collection and reuse system.
With reference to item #8 in the above list of sustainable characteristics
of the David Brower Center;
slag is a by-product formed as a result of smelting, welding and other
metallurgical and combustion processes involving metals or ores. Its use as a
construction material in buildings not only diverts it from the landfill, it
reduces the use of cement which in turn reduces the energy and resources
required to manufacture cement. Fly ash, a by-product from coal-fired power
plants, is also similarly used as a supplementary cementitious material. Both
slag and fly ash not only helps in reducing the use of cement and its
associated environmental impacts from manufacturing, they also make the
concrete stronger, more durable, and more resistant to chemical attack than
when it is constructed with cement alone.
Hearst Tower,
New York
Aside from the David
Brower Center,
there is a long list of other green buildings with very innovative sustainable
designs and functions. One other building significant to note is the Hearst Tower in New York that has a LEED Gold rating. Aside
from its energy/water efficiency features and recyclable content used in its
construction, what makes this building stand out is the use of the diagrid
system (diagonal + grid). It is a system which uses a series of triangles to
support the building which eliminates the need for vertical steel beams
altogether. The diagrid system not only provides stronger support due to the
force-distributing nature of the triangular framework, it also required 20%
less steel in the construction of the Hearst Tower.
That is a good 2,000 ton savings in steel.
The diagrid system used for the Hearst Tower
1. Mesiniaga Tower in Subang Jaya, Selangor (1993)
Although the above-listed Malaysian buildings may not be as impressive as
those abroad, they are definitely significant milestones for the development of
green buildings in the country. Now with our very own green building
certification, the GBI, equipped with specific guidelines and criteria for
certification, it will not be long before we see the construction of green
buildings that are on par with (if not better than) those abroad. Malaysia’s newest green building, named the Diamond building, is already under construction in
Putrajaya, Kuala Lumpur.
The Diamond building has a GREEN MARK Platinum rating from Singapore.
The Malaysian government is also very supportive of the development of green
buildings in the country. In fact, recently it has been decided that all new
government buildings must incorporate the features of GBI. Aside from that, in
the recent tabling of Malaysia’s
Budget 2010, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak announced tax exemption
for building owners who obtain the GBI certificate. In addition, buyers of
buildings with GBI certificates will also be exempted from stamp duty starting
from October 24 2009 until December 31 2014 – a good five years. A RM1.5
billion fund will also be set up to provide assistance to companies dealing
with green technology. With such political will, Malaysia is set to progress much
more significantly than ever before in the development of green buildings. It’s
about time anyway.
Source: http://umsgreenpulse.wordpress.com
No comments:
Post a Comment